--- title: "Japan's Demographic Collapse: Why It Needs Immigration but Refuses It" description: "In 2024, more diapers were sold in Japan for adults than for babies. It is a statistic that sounds almost comical until you grasp what it represents: a society aging so rapidly that its elderly now outnumber its children by margins unprecedented in human history. Last year, Japan recorded just 686,000 births—the lowest since records began in 1899—while over 1.6 million people died. Elementary schools are closing at a rate of 450 per year.\n\nJapan is not alone in this predicament. Birth rates are cratering everywhere. South Korea's fertility rate fell to 0.75 children per woman. Italy sits at 1.2, and even China has dropped to roughly one child per woman—and far lower in major cities like Shanghai. Large swaths of the developed world seem to have collectively decided that having children is too expensive, too difficult, or simply incompatible with modern life.\n\nThe difference is that many of these countries have turned, in some measure, to immigration to help offset their population declines. Japan, for its part, has steadfastly refused this lifeline. The math is hard to argue with: the country needs an estimated 6.74 million more workers by 2040 just to maintain modest growth. Yet despite the domestic population collapse, foreign residents make up less than 3 percent of the population, and Japan maintains some of the world's most restrictive immigration policies.\n\nWhy would a country commit itself to a path of managed decline, or even outright collapse, rather than accept outsiders? The answer reveals something profound about what happens when cultural identity collides with mathematical reality—and why even the most advanced societies can trap themselves in a decline they can see coming but, for some reason, cannot stop.\n\n## Key Takeaways\n\n- Japan recorded just 686,000 births in 2024, its lowest since 1899, against more than 1.6 million deaths, and elementary schools are closing at roughly 450 per year.\n- The country needs an estimated 6.74 million more workers by 2040 to sustain modest growth, yet foreign residents remain below 3 percent of the population.\n- A centuries-old self-image as a single, homogeneous people—reinforced by the Sakoku isolation era and postwar political rhetoric—makes immigration reform feel like an existential question rather than a policy one.\n- Japan pursues what amounts to \"stealth immigration,\" bringing in foreign labor through programs it refuses to call immigration, while avoiding the \"I\" word entirely.\n- Foreign nationals have jumped 37 percent since 2021, but the scale still falls far short of the estimated 647,000 annual workforce decline.\n- A rigid employment culture—built around once-a-year graduate hiring, lifetime jobs, and an \"irregular worker\" underclass—drives the low birth rate that immigration alone cannot fix.\n- Singapore and Denmark show that managed immigration can work, while Germany's 2015 experience illustrates the costs Japan most fears.\n\n## A Society Quietly Fading Away\n\nWalk through a rural Japanese town and you witness a society slowly fading. Children under 15 now make up just 11.1 percent of Japan's population, less than half the global average of 25 percent. For the first time in recorded history, there are more Japanese over 80 than under 10. Across the country, elementary schools close at a striking pace—around 450 each year. Their buildings are converted into facilities for the elderly, medical clinics, and funeral homes.\n\nThis growing scarcity of children creates something of an economic doom loop. Japan's working-age population shrank by more than half a million people last year alone—roughly the equivalent of losing the entire workforce of a mid-sized American city every single year. In 1960, there were more than 11 workers supporting each retiree. Today that number has crashed to roughly two workers per retiree, and the trend is accelerating.\n\nThis is a double blow. It is not only that fewer young people are working and contributing to the social safety net for retirees. The share of retirees has also exploded, compounding the strain.\n\n## The Fiscal Math of Aging\n\nThe numbers grow more alarming the closer you look. An elderly person over 75 costs the healthcare system roughly 965,000 yen annually—nearly four times the 252,000 yen spent on average for younger citizens. With the over-75 population set to reach 21 million this year in a country of 124 million, the fiscal arithmetic starts to become genuinely frightening.\n\nConsider the city of Utashinai in central Hokkaido. Once home to more than 40,000 residents in 1955, this isolated city's population had collapsed to just 2,662 by 2024. Its decline was not triggered by a single industry's failure; rather, it reflects the broader structural pressures facing Japan. Aging populations, extremely low birth rates, and decades of youth migration to urban centers have together hollowed out the countryside, with nobody to replace those who left.\n\nThe consequences tell their own story. Public services are stretched beyond breaking point, schools and businesses have shuttered, and entire neighborhoods sit empty or barely inhabited. Utashinai's elderly now make up over 50 percent of its residents, well above even Japan's already-high national average, and they have overwhelmed the local healthcare system. Meanwhile, a shrinking tax base leaves local governments struggling to maintain basic infrastructure, creating a vicious cycle in which declining services accelerate further population loss.\n\n## Trains for One Passenger\n\nThe infrastructure economics reveal the physical implausibility of managing this decline gracefully. JR Hokkaido, the railway company serving Japan's northernmost island, plans to abandon up to 1,237 kilometers of track—about half its entire network—and has already closed nearly a fifth of it. The reason is simple: some trains carry just nine passengers in the morning.\n\nThe Sekihoku Main Line has become infamous as an emblem of the crisis. At one otherwise abandoned station, a single high school student boards. The train runs at massive losses but has been kept running, in part to avoid confirming to the public what is already quite visibly obvious—there simply are not enough people. It is a microcosm of the country's larger dilemma: how do you maintain a modern society when there are not enough people to sustain it?\n\nJapan is hardly alone in facing demographic challenges. Declining birth rates are presenting problems for developed countries the world over. But unlike many of its counterparts, Japan has taken a comparatively hardline approach toward offsetting these declines with immigration. Its neighbor South Korea has expanded its foreign workforce modestly; as of December 2024, foreign residents make up roughly 5.2 percent of the population, nearly double Japan's share. Singapore, harder to compare directly given its city-state status, is renowned for welcoming policies that place its foreign-born residents at over 30 percent of the total. The question is not whether Japan needs immigration—the math speaks for itself—but why a country facing near-certain demographic catastrophe will not budge from a path that clearly is not working.\n\n## The Weight of Homogeneity\n\nThe economist Simon Kuznets once put it succinctly: \"There are four kinds of countries in the world: developed countries, underdeveloped countries, Japan, and Argentina.\" It is a simplification, but it captures just how unique a position Japan has long occupied—even if that uniqueness has begun to thaw slightly over the last few decades.\n\nTo understand Japan's paralysis on immigration, and why it remains such a taboo, you have to go back a long way. Between 1639 and 1853, the country went through over 200 years of radical isolation known as the Sakoku period. The name literally means \"chained country,\" and the policies were extreme: Japanese citizens were forbidden to leave under penalty of death, a rule that was enforced. Foreign ships approaching Japan were fired upon, and any trace of foreign influence was suppressed. The sole exception was a tiny Dutch trading post near Nagasaki, and even there foreigners had to remain on an artificial island rather than set foot on the mainland.\n\nEven after American gunboats forced Japan to open in the 1850s, the country's approach to modernization was selective. The spirit of the era was captured in the phrase \"Western technology, Japanese spirit.\"\n\n## From Imperial Ideology to National Narrative\n\nAs Japan's imperial ambitions grew, this insularity hardened into something more dangerous. The government promoted the belief that the Yamato people were uniquely pure, and backed that belief with more than rhetoric. This ideology drove Japan's brutal expansion across Asia from the 1890s through 1945. The conquest of Korea, the invasion of China, and other campaigns were justified in no small part by a belief in racial superiority that supposedly warranted Japanese domination of the continent.\n\nAfter 1945 and the fall of the empire, the explicit doctrine of racial supremacy was largely done away with. What did not disappear, however, was the idea of Japan as a monoethnic, culturally unified country—an idea that remained a powerful force in Japanese politics. This did not fade with time. In 2005, Foreign Minister Taro Aso did not mince words when he described the nation as \"one country, one civilization, one language, one culture, and one race.\" He would later serve as prime minister.\n\nYet, as with so many claims of unified ethnic homogeneity, the reality on the ground is more complicated. The indigenous Ainu people of Hokkaido still exist, though their numbers have dwindled after centuries of oppression; the most recent available report shows roughly 13,000 self-identifying as Ainu, while scholars believe the true figure ranges between 20,000 and 30,000, with discrimination making many reluctant to disclose that identity. Around 409,000 ethnic Koreans, many descended from forced laborers during the colonial period, remain in Japan after generations. The Burakumin, ethnically Japanese but historically discriminated against because of \"impure\" occupations, number in the millions. And Okinawans hold a distinct culture and history, having faced their own persecution.\n\n## The Invisible Wall\n\nJapan's national narrative tends to erase these minorities. When Aso made his statement two decades ago, he was not describing reality so much as enforcing an idea of what he might like reality to be. This centuries-old story of isolation and homogeneity has become something of a psychological prison. The very idea of Japan as anything other than ethnically Japanese can feel, to many, like an existential threat to national identity.\n\nThis is the invisible wall that makes immigration reform so difficult. You can present all the demographic data you want, show the mathematical certainty of collapse, and point to more successful models in Singapore and, to a lesser extent, South Korea. But when a national story is built on being one unique, homogeneous people—when that has been the foundation of identity for centuries—opening the doors can feel less like a policy choice and more like inviting an invasion.\n\nAnd yet, even this seemingly impenetrable barrier has begun to crack.\n\n## The Quiet Revolution\n\nSomething is happening that has not captured international headlines. Japan is quietly opening its doors—or perhaps \"cracking them open\" is the more accurate description. Since 2021, foreign nationals living in the country have jumped 37 percent, or nearly 1 million people.\n\nThe cornerstone of Japan's approach has been, and remains, what might be called \"stealth immigration\": bringing in foreign workers while doing its absolute best to avoid using that label. One vehicle has been the Technical Intern Training Program, officially designed to teach foreign workers skills they could not learn at home before sending them back after a few years. Launched in 1993 as a tiny project and expanded considerably since, the program has not treated workers well. Many earn less than minimum wage in jobs that domestic citizens will not touch—agriculture, construction, and fish processing among them. They cannot change employers regardless of how they are treated, because their legal status is tied to a single company. And after five years, they have to leave it all behind.\n\nThe exploitation runs so deep that in 2022, over 9,000 interns simply vanished, fleeing abusive employers for the underground economy.\n\n## A Rebrand With Real Changes\n\nThe intern program is set to be abolished in 2027 and replaced with something called Employment for Skill Development. This is more than a rebrand. While not revolutionary, it offers a substantial overhaul of the quality-of-life standards that migrant workers experience. The new system will allow them to change employers, addressing the worst exploitation, and create clearer paths to longer-term residence.\n\nThe political language remains telling. When former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe introduced new visa categories in 2018, aiming to bring in 345,000 workers over five years, he insisted these reforms did not constitute an \"immigration policy.\" At the heart of the reforms has been a doctrine to never, ever say the \"I\" word. Regardless of how politicians categorize it, the 2018 \"specified skilled worker\" visa represents the biggest shift in recent history. Holders can renew indefinitely, and some can even bring family members.\n\nThe change is visible on the ground. In parts of Shinjuku, more than 10 percent of residents in their twenties are foreign-born. Convenience stores operate in multiple languages. Vietnamese and Nepali function as unofficial second languages in the service industry. Construction sites echo with Tagalog. Nursing homes depend on Indonesian and Filipino staff. The transformation is slow, but it is happening.\n\n## A Paradox of Public Opinion\n\nDespite these changes, the scale remains modest. Even with recent increases, Japan is nowhere near the level needed merely to halt its workforce decline, currently estimated as high as 647,000 annually.\n\nThis produces a fascinating paradox in public opinion. Polls in Japan have to be read through the lens of whether they use the \"I\" word. Surveys that ask about \"more immigration\" find only 23 percent support. But when respondents are asked about increasing the number of \"skilled foreign workers\" without using the \"I\" word, support jumps to 62 percent, as of 2024. The labor is welcome; the label is not.\n\nJapan's caution, while extreme, is not entirely irrational. For years, officials have watched Europe's experience with alarm, and there are genuine lessons there. Germany's decision to accept over a million refugees after 2015 transformed both domestic and continental politics and raised real concerns among observers abroad. The rise of the far-right Alternative for Germany to become one of the country's most popular parties, in large part by capitalizing on immigration, carries real implications for policymakers.\n\n## Lessons From Europe, and From Asia\n\nThe social costs in Germany made the influx deeply unpopular—housing shortages, overwhelmed schools, and longer waits for doctors among them. The financial burden was substantial, and amid a stagnating economy, some Germans have begun to emigrate, a trend that has accelerated in recent years. Crucially, there was little preparation: scant thought given to accommodation or integration, and limited support even to learn the language. The result was predictable—parallel societies, concentrated poverty, and political radicalization. For Japan, the lesson reads clearly: avoid sudden, large-scale influxes that overwhelm existing systems. The 2015 images of chaos at European borders, train stations packed with migrants, and streams of largely young men crossing the countryside toward Germany would confirm every Japanese fear.\n\nBut this should not be read to mean immigration always fails. Both Singapore and Denmark show it can work when managed properly. Singapore maintains strict controls alongside genuine integration pathways, preventing the social segregation that has caused problems elsewhere. Denmark has adapted over time, balancing refugee obligations with a stronger emphasis on integration—language tests and mandatory assimilation courses for children born to foreign parents—while investing heavily in welcoming migrants and offering a route to permanent residence. Successful workers can transition to permanent residence and, eventually, citizenship. The message is a positive incentive structure: contribute, and you are one of us.\n\nJapan's current approach guarantees neither the benefits of immigration nor protection from its risks. By maintaining a caste of temporary workers who leave after a few years, it ensures they never become Japanese, but instead form a disconnected, isolated underclass with little stake in society. Workers who know they must leave have little reason to integrate; they will, after all, never be Japanese. It is a loop of circular logic that benefits almost no one.\n\n## Wanting the Labor, Not the Laborers\n\nEven the reformed programs preserve this self-defeating impermanence. The new specified-skilled-worker visas offer paths to renewal, but those paths are anything but guaranteed. Integration support remains minimal—no systematic language education, no cultural orientation, no structured pathway planning. Japan wants the labor but not the laborers; the work but not the workers.\n\nPerhaps the biggest problem with this stagnation is that demographics do not move gradually. Japan's working-age population is not declining gracefully so much as falling off a cliff. The debt-to-GDP ratio, long among the highest in the world, is set to explode without dramatic intervention. The longer the country kicks the can down the road, the worse it gets. Japan is fortunate enough not to absolutely require immigration on the scale Germany absorbed, but every year it waits to act is another year of worsening domestic demographics.\n\nThe approach resembles bailing out the Titanic with buckets. It may make policymakers feel they are doing something, but the ship is sinking. It is hard to envision a path out of this crisis that does not include considerably more immigration—or, to use the preferred term, foreign workers. Yet immigration is not a cure-all either. Japan's economic uniqueness contributes substantially to the decline, and it must be addressed to understand how the country arrived here and how to keep it from happening again.\n\n## The Roots in the Workforce\n\nEven if Japan threw open its borders tomorrow, it would not be enough, because the demographic crisis is just one symptom of a deeper problem. Without addressing the root cause, immigration would merely delay the symptoms.\n\nConsider how young Japanese enter the workforce, a process that perfectly illustrates the problem. A person's entire professional life is essentially determined at age 22 through a system called shukatsu, which translates to \"job hunting activities.\" Companies hire fresh university graduates exactly once per year, in April. Miss that window and you are not just out of luck for a year—you are effectively marked for life as an \"irregular\" worker.\n\nThe process is almost ritualistic. Students wear identical black suits, attend mass recruitment events, and compete for positions at major corporations that promise lifetime employment. Get hired by Mitsubishi or Toyota at 22, and you are essentially set for life as long as you deliver for the company. They will train you, promote you where you do best, and care for you until retirement. Once inside, many have little control over their career direction; if the company decides you will perform better in a certain department, that is where you go. There is little room for individual preference.\n\n## The Irregular Worker Underclass\n\nThis system offers next to zero flexibility. Want to change careers at 30? Other companies generally will not hire mid-career professionals for permanent positions. The rigidity creates cascading effects across society that immigration alone cannot fix.\n\nOver one-third of Japan's workforce consists of \"irregular workers,\" often trapped in a cycle of temporary employment after missing the new-graduate hiring window. They hop between convenience store jobs and short-term contracts, earning perhaps half what their regularly employed peers make. Such a system is disastrous for anyone who does not have their life entirely together at 22—and this is millions of people. How many of them, under a slightly less rigid system that gave them a real chance to succeed later in life, would have gone on to start families? In a demographic crisis as severe as Japan's, this arrangement simply cannot be sustainable.\n\nThen there is the phenomenon of hikikomori—an estimated 1.5 million people, often men, who have withdrawn from society entirely. They frequently live in total isolation with their parents and rarely leave their rooms. It is not a rational response, but it becomes more understandable when you consider people who have largely given up after being told their lives are permanently off course.\n\n## The Choice Forced on Women\n\nWomen face an even starker choice. The lifetime employment system assumes continuous work from 22 to 65, with regular overtime. While the government has made modest reforms to expand access to maternity leave, far too many women are still forced to choose between a career and starting a family. The system struggles to accommodate a woman who chooses to have children; stories abound of women locked out of the workforce after childbirth regardless of their skills or work ethic.\n\nThe government is not blind to this. It has tinkered with reforms for decades, encouraging \"work style reforms,\" trying to reduce overtime culture, and promoting maternity leave. But these are surface-level changes that do not touch the underlying structure.\n\nThis is where immigration fits. On a purely numerical level, it could help slow the demographic bleed. But for how long? Suppose Japan starts admitting more immigrants. Set aside that they are locked out of many jobs because they were not in the country for shukatsu—some may overlook this, since they are not technically \"irregular workers.\" Even so, if they fully integrate into Japanese society, they will face the same dilemma native-born people do: choosing between career and family. Immigration is needed to help stabilize the collapse, but presenting it as a miracle cure would be wrong. Japan has a host of domestic issues driving its citizens toward this demographic cliff. The cost-of-living crisis has pressured young professionals the world over—but Japan has built its trap in a way like nobody else.\n\n## A Crisis Japan Can See Coming\n\nJapan faces a demographic reality unlike any modern nation has encountered. The speed and scale of the projected collapse—from 128 million toward a possible 60 to 70 million by the century's end—is significant enough to be described as a peacetime demographic catastrophe.\n\nThe tragedy is not that Japan lacks options. Singapore shows how an Asian nation can integrate immigrants while maintaining social cohesion. South Korea, facing similar pressures, has doubled its foreign population. Even within Japan, businesses in sectors that citizens are reluctant to enter hire desperately whenever the rigid system allows.\n\nThe global implications extend beyond Japan's borders. As the world's third-largest economy risks implosion, and as a key American ally hollows out, the reverberations will be felt worldwide. Japan's experience previews what happens when societies become too inflexible to survive. The hardest part is that Japan knows exactly what is happening and where it leads. It has the data, the projections, and the examples of what works elsewhere. It also has the wealth and technology to manage immigration better than almost anyone. And as of mid-2026, it is still, in effect, twiddling its thumbs.\n\n## Frequently Asked Questions\n\n**How severe is Japan's demographic decline?**\nIn 2024, Japan recorded just 686,000 births, its lowest since records began in 1899, while more than 1.6 million people died. Elementary schools are closing at roughly 450 per year, and for the first time in recorded history there are more Japanese over 80 than under 10. The population is projected to fall from 128 million toward 60 to 70 million by the century's end.\n\n**How many more workers does Japan need, and how few foreigners does it have?**\nJapan needs an estimated 6.74 million more workers by 2040 just to maintain modest growth, and its workforce is currently shrinking by as much as 647,000 people annually. Despite this, foreign residents make up less than 3 percent of the population—far below South Korea's 5.2 percent or Singapore's 30-plus percent.\n\n**Why is Japan so resistant to immigration?**\nThe resistance is rooted in a centuries-old self-image as a single, homogeneous people. The Sakoku era sealed the country off for more than 200 years, and postwar politics preserved the idea of a monoethnic nation, captured in Foreign Minister Taro Aso's 2005 description of \"one country, one civilization, one language, one culture, and one race.\" For many, opening the doors feels like an existential threat rather than a policy choice.\n\n**What is \"stealth immigration\"?**\nIt is the practice of bringing in foreign workers while avoiding the word \"immigration.\" Programs like the Technical Intern Training Program, launched in 1993, and the 2018 specified-skilled-worker visa import labor without being framed as immigration policy. Public support reflects this: only 23 percent back \"more immigration,\" but 62 percent support more \"skilled foreign workers.\"\n\n**Why won't immigration alone fix the problem?**\nBecause the low birth rate stems from a rigid economic structure. The shukatsu system hires graduates only once a year, in April, and those who miss it become \"irregular workers\"—over a third of the workforce—earning roughly half what regular employees make. Combined with a lifetime-employment culture that forces women to choose between career and family, this drives people away from forming families, a dynamic immigrants would eventually face too.\n\n**Which countries does Japan look to as warnings and as models?**\nGermany's acceptance of over a million refugees after 2015, with little preparation for integration, serves as Japan's cautionary tale, associated with parallel societies and political radicalization. By contrast, Singapore and Denmark are cited as models that pair strict controls with genuine integration pathways and routes to permanent residence and citizenship.\n\n**What does Japan's situation mean for the rest of the world?**\nAs the world's third-largest economy and a key American ally, a hollowed-out Japan would send reverberations worldwide. Its trajectory previews what can happen when an advanced society becomes too inflexible to adapt, offering a closely watched test case for other nations facing falling birth rates.\n\n## Sources\n\n- [Japan Times — Medical fees hit record high](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/09/04/japan/science-health/medical-fees-record-high/)\n- [Reuters — Special report: Asia population, Japan children](https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/asia-population-japan-children/)\n- [New America Media (archived)](https://web.archive.org/web/20070927175325/http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=f6f50bd7a1687ece711a7ef721bb6fb8)\n- [Indigenous Navigator — Japan report (PDF)](https://indigenousnavigator.org/files/media/document/Japan_ENG_0.pdf)\n- [Wikipedia — Koreans in Japan](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koreans_in_Japan)\n- [Japan Times — Europe's migration problem](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2023/05/04/commentary/world-commentary/europe-migration-problem/)\n- [Asahi Shimbun](https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15820762)\n- [Reuters — Japan must quadruple foreign workers by 2040](https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/japan-must-quadruple-foreign-workers-by-2040-meet-growth-target-report-2022-02-03/)\n- [Teachwire — The Japanese train that stops for just one high school student](https://www.teachwire.net/news/the-curious-tale-of-the-japanese-train-that-stops-for-just-one-high-school/)\n- [Japan Times — Foreign workers new residency system](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/07/28/japan/foreign-workers-new-residency-system/)\n- [ResearchGate — NEETs and freeters in Japan](https://www.researchgate.net/figure/NEETs-and-freeters-as-a-percentage-of-all-15-35-year-olds-in-employment-in-Japan-and_fig2_269280713)\n- [Japan Times — Fertility rate low](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/06/04/japan/fertility-rate-low/)\n- [France 24 — Japan births in 2024 fell below 700,000 for first time](https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250604-japan-births-in-2024-fell-below-700-000-for-first-time)\n- [City of Utashinai (archived)](https://web.archive.org/web/20210115141648/http://www.city.utashinai.hokkaido.jp/hotnews/detail/00000027.html)\n- [Al Jazeera — Last students graduate as school closures spread in aging Japan](https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2023/4/2/last-students-graduate-school-closures-spread-in-ageing-japan)\n- [Reuters — South Korea's policy push as life springs into world's lowest birthrate](https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/south-koreas-policy-push-springs-life-worlds-lowest-birthrate-rises-2025-02-26/)\n- [The Times — Italy shock therapy birthrate](https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/italy-shock-therapy-birthrate-latest-dk8qvwwrw)\n- [South China Morning Post — China's pro-birth policies not yet enough](https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3282963/chinas-pro-birth-policies-not-yet-enough-counter-demographic-crisis-expert-warns)\n- [Real Gaijin — Population of foreign residents in Japan](https://realgaijin.substack.com/p/population-of-foreign-residents-in)\n- [Nippon.com — Japan data](https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h02400/)\n- [World Bank — Population ages 0-14 (% of total)](https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.0014.TO.ZS)\n- [Asahi Shimbun](https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15952384)\n- [FRED — Working age population, Japan](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/SPPOPDPNDOLJPN)\n- [Xinhua](https://english.news.cn/asiapacific/20250414/062f35c875934cbeb4d1ce825dbfad51/c.html)\n- [Nippon.com — Japan data](https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h00795/)\n- [Korea Times — Foreign residents in South Korea hit all-time high](https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/society/20250303/foreign-residents-in-south-korea-hit-all-time-high-account-for-over-5-of-population)\n- [Sengoku Chronicles — Japan's Sakoku policy](https://sengokuchronicles.com/japans-sakoku-policy-isolation-and-cultural-preservation/)\n- [Unseen Japan — Japan technical trainees job change](https://unseen-japan.com/japan-technical-trainees-job-change/)\n- [Reuters — Japan opens door wider to foreign blue-collar workers](https://www.reuters.com/article/world/japan-opens-door-wider-to-foreign-blue-collar-workers-despite-criticism-idUSKBN1O704C/)\n- [Asia Pacific Foundation — Japan needs more labour immigration](https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/japan-needs-more-labour-immigration-answer)\n- [Asahi Shimbun](https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14875679)\n\n" url: https://homefronts.pub/article/japan-immigration-demographic-collapse.md canonical: https://homefronts.pub/article/japan-immigration-demographic-collapse datePublished: 2026-06-03 dateModified: 2026-06-03 author: - name: Simon Whistler url: https://homefronts.pub/author/simon-whistler publisher: HomeFronts image: "https://media.homefronts.pub/cdn-cgi/image/width=1600,height=900,fit=cover,quality=80,format=auto/articles/Yak-pnLJpUY/hero.jpg" type: Article contentHash: 7d950bc139d0ecb5b944f29c316b4dd182e16b945446e2fec34ea1117bb97572 tokens: 7861 summaryUrl: https://homefronts.pub/article/japan-immigration-demographic-collapse.md.summary.md --- In 2024, more diapers were sold in Japan for adults than for babies. It is a statistic that sounds almost comical until you grasp what it represents: a society aging so rapidly that its elderly now outnumber its children by margins unprecedented in human history. Last year, Japan recorded just 686,000 births—the lowest since records began in 1899—while over 1.6 million people died. Elementary schools are closing at a rate of 450 per year. Japan is not alone in this predicament. Birth rates are cratering everywhere. South Korea's fertility rate fell to 0.75 children per woman. Italy sits at 1.2, and even China has dropped to roughly one child per woman—and far lower in major cities like Shanghai. Large swaths of the developed world seem to have collectively decided that having children is too expensive, too difficult, or simply incompatible with modern life. The difference is that many of these countries have turned, in some measure, to immigration to help offset their population declines. Japan, for its part, has steadfastly refused this lifeline. The math is hard to argue with: the country needs an estimated 6.74 million more workers by 2040 just to maintain modest growth. Yet despite the domestic population collapse, foreign residents make up less than 3 percent of the population, and Japan maintains some of the world's most restrictive immigration policies. Why would a country commit itself to a path of managed decline, or even outright collapse, rather than accept outsiders? The answer reveals something profound about what happens when cultural identity collides with mathematical reality—and why even the most advanced societies can trap themselves in a decline they can see coming but, for some reason, cannot stop. ## Key Takeaways - Japan recorded just 686,000 births in 2024, its lowest since 1899, against more than 1.6 million deaths, and elementary schools are closing at roughly 450 per year. - The country needs an estimated 6.74 million more workers by 2040 to sustain modest growth, yet foreign residents remain below 3 percent of the population. - A centuries-old self-image as a single, homogeneous people—reinforced by the Sakoku isolation era and postwar political rhetoric—makes immigration reform feel like an existential question rather than a policy one. - Japan pursues what amounts to "stealth immigration," bringing in foreign labor through programs it refuses to call immigration, while avoiding the "I" word entirely. - Foreign nationals have jumped 37 percent since 2021, but the scale still falls far short of the estimated 647,000 annual workforce decline. - A rigid employment culture—built around once-a-year graduate hiring, lifetime jobs, and an "irregular worker" underclass—drives the low birth rate that immigration alone cannot fix. - Singapore and Denmark show that managed immigration can work, while Germany's 2015 experience illustrates the costs Japan most fears. ## A Society Quietly Fading Away Walk through a rural Japanese town and you witness a society slowly fading. Children under 15 now make up just 11.1 percent of Japan's population, less than half the global average of 25 percent. For the first time in recorded history, there are more Japanese over 80 than under 10. Across the country, elementary schools close at a striking pace—around 450 each year. Their buildings are converted into facilities for the elderly, medical clinics, and funeral homes. This growing scarcity of children creates something of an economic doom loop. Japan's working-age population shrank by more than half a million people last year alone—roughly the equivalent of losing the entire workforce of a mid-sized American city every single year. In 1960, there were more than 11 workers supporting each retiree. Today that number has crashed to roughly two workers per retiree, and the trend is accelerating. This is a double blow. It is not only that fewer young people are working and contributing to the social safety net for retirees. The share of retirees has also exploded, compounding the strain. ## The Fiscal Math of Aging The numbers grow more alarming the closer you look. An elderly person over 75 costs the healthcare system roughly 965,000 yen annually—nearly four times the 252,000 yen spent on average for younger citizens. With the over-75 population set to reach 21 million this year in a country of 124 million, the fiscal arithmetic starts to become genuinely frightening. Consider the city of Utashinai in central Hokkaido. Once home to more than 40,000 residents in 1955, this isolated city's population had collapsed to just 2,662 by 2024. Its decline was not triggered by a single industry's failure; rather, it reflects the broader structural pressures facing Japan. Aging populations, extremely low birth rates, and decades of youth migration to urban centers have together hollowed out the countryside, with nobody to replace those who left. The consequences tell their own story. Public services are stretched beyond breaking point, schools and businesses have shuttered, and entire neighborhoods sit empty or barely inhabited. Utashinai's elderly now make up over 50 percent of its residents, well above even Japan's already-high national average, and they have overwhelmed the local healthcare system. Meanwhile, a shrinking tax base leaves local governments struggling to maintain basic infrastructure, creating a vicious cycle in which declining services accelerate further population loss. ## Trains for One Passenger The infrastructure economics reveal the physical implausibility of managing this decline gracefully. JR Hokkaido, the railway company serving Japan's northernmost island, plans to abandon up to 1,237 kilometers of track—about half its entire network—and has already closed nearly a fifth of it. The reason is simple: some trains carry just nine passengers in the morning. The Sekihoku Main Line has become infamous as an emblem of the crisis. At one otherwise abandoned station, a single high school student boards. The train runs at massive losses but has been kept running, in part to avoid confirming to the public what is already quite visibly obvious—there simply are not enough people. It is a microcosm of the country's larger dilemma: how do you maintain a modern society when there are not enough people to sustain it? Japan is hardly alone in facing demographic challenges. Declining birth rates are presenting problems for developed countries the world over. But unlike many of its counterparts, Japan has taken a comparatively hardline approach toward offsetting these declines with immigration. Its neighbor South Korea has expanded its foreign workforce modestly; as of December 2024, foreign residents make up roughly 5.2 percent of the population, nearly double Japan's share. Singapore, harder to compare directly given its city-state status, is renowned for welcoming policies that place its foreign-born residents at over 30 percent of the total. The question is not whether Japan needs immigration—the math speaks for itself—but why a country facing near-certain demographic catastrophe will not budge from a path that clearly is not working. ## The Weight of Homogeneity The economist Simon Kuznets once put it succinctly: "There are four kinds of countries in the world: developed countries, underdeveloped countries, Japan, and Argentina." It is a simplification, but it captures just how unique a position Japan has long occupied—even if that uniqueness has begun to thaw slightly over the last few decades. To understand Japan's paralysis on immigration, and why it remains such a taboo, you have to go back a long way. Between 1639 and 1853, the country went through over 200 years of radical isolation known as the Sakoku period. The name literally means "chained country," and the policies were extreme: Japanese citizens were forbidden to leave under penalty of death, a rule that was enforced. Foreign ships approaching Japan were fired upon, and any trace of foreign influence was suppressed. The sole exception was a tiny Dutch trading post near Nagasaki, and even there foreigners had to remain on an artificial island rather than set foot on the mainland. Even after American gunboats forced Japan to open in the 1850s, the country's approach to modernization was selective. The spirit of the era was captured in the phrase "Western technology, Japanese spirit." ## From Imperial Ideology to National Narrative As Japan's imperial ambitions grew, this insularity hardened into something more dangerous. The government promoted the belief that the Yamato people were uniquely pure, and backed that belief with more than rhetoric. This ideology drove Japan's brutal expansion across Asia from the 1890s through 1945. The conquest of Korea, the invasion of China, and other campaigns were justified in no small part by a belief in racial superiority that supposedly warranted Japanese domination of the continent. After 1945 and the fall of the empire, the explicit doctrine of racial supremacy was largely done away with. What did not disappear, however, was the idea of Japan as a monoethnic, culturally unified country—an idea that remained a powerful force in Japanese politics. This did not fade with time. In 2005, Foreign Minister Taro Aso did not mince words when he described the nation as "one country, one civilization, one language, one culture, and one race." He would later serve as prime minister. Yet, as with so many claims of unified ethnic homogeneity, the reality on the ground is more complicated. The indigenous Ainu people of Hokkaido still exist, though their numbers have dwindled after centuries of oppression; the most recent available report shows roughly 13,000 self-identifying as Ainu, while scholars believe the true figure ranges between 20,000 and 30,000, with discrimination making many reluctant to disclose that identity. Around 409,000 ethnic Koreans, many descended from forced laborers during the colonial period, remain in Japan after generations. The Burakumin, ethnically Japanese but historically discriminated against because of "impure" occupations, number in the millions. And Okinawans hold a distinct culture and history, having faced their own persecution. ## The Invisible Wall Japan's national narrative tends to erase these minorities. When Aso made his statement two decades ago, he was not describing reality so much as enforcing an idea of what he might like reality to be. This centuries-old story of isolation and homogeneity has become something of a psychological prison. The very idea of Japan as anything other than ethnically Japanese can feel, to many, like an existential threat to national identity. This is the invisible wall that makes immigration reform so difficult. You can present all the demographic data you want, show the mathematical certainty of collapse, and point to more successful models in Singapore and, to a lesser extent, South Korea. But when a national story is built on being one unique, homogeneous people—when that has been the foundation of identity for centuries—opening the doors can feel less like a policy choice and more like inviting an invasion. And yet, even this seemingly impenetrable barrier has begun to crack. ## The Quiet Revolution Something is happening that has not captured international headlines. Japan is quietly opening its doors—or perhaps "cracking them open" is the more accurate description. Since 2021, foreign nationals living in the country have jumped 37 percent, or nearly 1 million people. The cornerstone of Japan's approach has been, and remains, what might be called "stealth immigration": bringing in foreign workers while doing its absolute best to avoid using that label. One vehicle has been the Technical Intern Training Program, officially designed to teach foreign workers skills they could not learn at home before sending them back after a few years. Launched in 1993 as a tiny project and expanded considerably since, the program has not treated workers well. Many earn less than minimum wage in jobs that domestic citizens will not touch—agriculture, construction, and fish processing among them. They cannot change employers regardless of how they are treated, because their legal status is tied to a single company. And after five years, they have to leave it all behind. The exploitation runs so deep that in 2022, over 9,000 interns simply vanished, fleeing abusive employers for the underground economy. ## A Rebrand With Real Changes The intern program is set to be abolished in 2027 and replaced with something called Employment for Skill Development. This is more than a rebrand. While not revolutionary, it offers a substantial overhaul of the quality-of-life standards that migrant workers experience. The new system will allow them to change employers, addressing the worst exploitation, and create clearer paths to longer-term residence. The political language remains telling. When former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe introduced new visa categories in 2018, aiming to bring in 345,000 workers over five years, he insisted these reforms did not constitute an "immigration policy." At the heart of the reforms has been a doctrine to never, ever say the "I" word. Regardless of how politicians categorize it, the 2018 "specified skilled worker" visa represents the biggest shift in recent history. Holders can renew indefinitely, and some can even bring family members. The change is visible on the ground. In parts of Shinjuku, more than 10 percent of residents in their twenties are foreign-born. Convenience stores operate in multiple languages. Vietnamese and Nepali function as unofficial second languages in the service industry. Construction sites echo with Tagalog. Nursing homes depend on Indonesian and Filipino staff. The transformation is slow, but it is happening. ## A Paradox of Public Opinion Despite these changes, the scale remains modest. Even with recent increases, Japan is nowhere near the level needed merely to halt its workforce decline, currently estimated as high as 647,000 annually. This produces a fascinating paradox in public opinion. Polls in Japan have to be read through the lens of whether they use the "I" word. Surveys that ask about "more immigration" find only 23 percent support. But when respondents are asked about increasing the number of "skilled foreign workers" without using the "I" word, support jumps to 62 percent, as of 2024. The labor is welcome; the label is not. Japan's caution, while extreme, is not entirely irrational. For years, officials have watched Europe's experience with alarm, and there are genuine lessons there. Germany's decision to accept over a million refugees after 2015 transformed both domestic and continental politics and raised real concerns among observers abroad. The rise of the far-right Alternative for Germany to become one of the country's most popular parties, in large part by capitalizing on immigration, carries real implications for policymakers. ## Lessons From Europe, and From Asia The social costs in Germany made the influx deeply unpopular—housing shortages, overwhelmed schools, and longer waits for doctors among them. The financial burden was substantial, and amid a stagnating economy, some Germans have begun to emigrate, a trend that has accelerated in recent years. Crucially, there was little preparation: scant thought given to accommodation or integration, and limited support even to learn the language. The result was predictable—parallel societies, concentrated poverty, and political radicalization. For Japan, the lesson reads clearly: avoid sudden, large-scale influxes that overwhelm existing systems. The 2015 images of chaos at European borders, train stations packed with migrants, and streams of largely young men crossing the countryside toward Germany would confirm every Japanese fear. But this should not be read to mean immigration always fails. Both Singapore and Denmark show it can work when managed properly. Singapore maintains strict controls alongside genuine integration pathways, preventing the social segregation that has caused problems elsewhere. Denmark has adapted over time, balancing refugee obligations with a stronger emphasis on integration—language tests and mandatory assimilation courses for children born to foreign parents—while investing heavily in welcoming migrants and offering a route to permanent residence. Successful workers can transition to permanent residence and, eventually, citizenship. The message is a positive incentive structure: contribute, and you are one of us. Japan's current approach guarantees neither the benefits of immigration nor protection from its risks. By maintaining a caste of temporary workers who leave after a few years, it ensures they never become Japanese, but instead form a disconnected, isolated underclass with little stake in society. Workers who know they must leave have little reason to integrate; they will, after all, never be Japanese. It is a loop of circular logic that benefits almost no one. ## Wanting the Labor, Not the Laborers Even the reformed programs preserve this self-defeating impermanence. The new specified-skilled-worker visas offer paths to renewal, but those paths are anything but guaranteed. Integration support remains minimal—no systematic language education, no cultural orientation, no structured pathway planning. Japan wants the labor but not the laborers; the work but not the workers. Perhaps the biggest problem with this stagnation is that demographics do not move gradually. Japan's working-age population is not declining gracefully so much as falling off a cliff. The debt-to-GDP ratio, long among the highest in the world, is set to explode without dramatic intervention. The longer the country kicks the can down the road, the worse it gets. Japan is fortunate enough not to absolutely require immigration on the scale Germany absorbed, but every year it waits to act is another year of worsening domestic demographics. The approach resembles bailing out the Titanic with buckets. It may make policymakers feel they are doing something, but the ship is sinking. It is hard to envision a path out of this crisis that does not include considerably more immigration—or, to use the preferred term, foreign workers. Yet immigration is not a cure-all either. Japan's economic uniqueness contributes substantially to the decline, and it must be addressed to understand how the country arrived here and how to keep it from happening again. ## The Roots in the Workforce Even if Japan threw open its borders tomorrow, it would not be enough, because the demographic crisis is just one symptom of a deeper problem. Without addressing the root cause, immigration would merely delay the symptoms. Consider how young Japanese enter the workforce, a process that perfectly illustrates the problem. A person's entire professional life is essentially determined at age 22 through a system called shukatsu, which translates to "job hunting activities." Companies hire fresh university graduates exactly once per year, in April. Miss that window and you are not just out of luck for a year—you are effectively marked for life as an "irregular" worker. The process is almost ritualistic. Students wear identical black suits, attend mass recruitment events, and compete for positions at major corporations that promise lifetime employment. Get hired by Mitsubishi or Toyota at 22, and you are essentially set for life as long as you deliver for the company. They will train you, promote you where you do best, and care for you until retirement. Once inside, many have little control over their career direction; if the company decides you will perform better in a certain department, that is where you go. There is little room for individual preference. ## The Irregular Worker Underclass This system offers next to zero flexibility. Want to change careers at 30? Other companies generally will not hire mid-career professionals for permanent positions. The rigidity creates cascading effects across society that immigration alone cannot fix. Over one-third of Japan's workforce consists of "irregular workers," often trapped in a cycle of temporary employment after missing the new-graduate hiring window. They hop between convenience store jobs and short-term contracts, earning perhaps half what their regularly employed peers make. Such a system is disastrous for anyone who does not have their life entirely together at 22—and this is millions of people. How many of them, under a slightly less rigid system that gave them a real chance to succeed later in life, would have gone on to start families? In a demographic crisis as severe as Japan's, this arrangement simply cannot be sustainable. Then there is the phenomenon of hikikomori—an estimated 1.5 million people, often men, who have withdrawn from society entirely. They frequently live in total isolation with their parents and rarely leave their rooms. It is not a rational response, but it becomes more understandable when you consider people who have largely given up after being told their lives are permanently off course. ## The Choice Forced on Women Women face an even starker choice. The lifetime employment system assumes continuous work from 22 to 65, with regular overtime. While the government has made modest reforms to expand access to maternity leave, far too many women are still forced to choose between a career and starting a family. The system struggles to accommodate a woman who chooses to have children; stories abound of women locked out of the workforce after childbirth regardless of their skills or work ethic. The government is not blind to this. It has tinkered with reforms for decades, encouraging "work style reforms," trying to reduce overtime culture, and promoting maternity leave. But these are surface-level changes that do not touch the underlying structure. This is where immigration fits. On a purely numerical level, it could help slow the demographic bleed. But for how long? Suppose Japan starts admitting more immigrants. Set aside that they are locked out of many jobs because they were not in the country for shukatsu—some may overlook this, since they are not technically "irregular workers." Even so, if they fully integrate into Japanese society, they will face the same dilemma native-born people do: choosing between career and family. Immigration is needed to help stabilize the collapse, but presenting it as a miracle cure would be wrong. Japan has a host of domestic issues driving its citizens toward this demographic cliff. The cost-of-living crisis has pressured young professionals the world over—but Japan has built its trap in a way like nobody else. ## A Crisis Japan Can See Coming Japan faces a demographic reality unlike any modern nation has encountered. The speed and scale of the projected collapse—from 128 million toward a possible 60 to 70 million by the century's end—is significant enough to be described as a peacetime demographic catastrophe. The tragedy is not that Japan lacks options. Singapore shows how an Asian nation can integrate immigrants while maintaining social cohesion. South Korea, facing similar pressures, has doubled its foreign population. Even within Japan, businesses in sectors that citizens are reluctant to enter hire desperately whenever the rigid system allows. The global implications extend beyond Japan's borders. As the world's third-largest economy risks implosion, and as a key American ally hollows out, the reverberations will be felt worldwide. Japan's experience previews what happens when societies become too inflexible to survive. The hardest part is that Japan knows exactly what is happening and where it leads. It has the data, the projections, and the examples of what works elsewhere. It also has the wealth and technology to manage immigration better than almost anyone. And as of mid-2026, it is still, in effect, twiddling its thumbs. ## Frequently Asked Questions **How severe is Japan's demographic decline?** In 2024, Japan recorded just 686,000 births, its lowest since records began in 1899, while more than 1.6 million people died. Elementary schools are closing at roughly 450 per year, and for the first time in recorded history there are more Japanese over 80 than under 10. The population is projected to fall from 128 million toward 60 to 70 million by the century's end. **How many more workers does Japan need, and how few foreigners does it have?** Japan needs an estimated 6.74 million more workers by 2040 just to maintain modest growth, and its workforce is currently shrinking by as much as 647,000 people annually. Despite this, foreign residents make up less than 3 percent of the population—far below South Korea's 5.2 percent or Singapore's 30-plus percent. **Why is Japan so resistant to immigration?** The resistance is rooted in a centuries-old self-image as a single, homogeneous people. The Sakoku era sealed the country off for more than 200 years, and postwar politics preserved the idea of a monoethnic nation, captured in Foreign Minister Taro Aso's 2005 description of "one country, one civilization, one language, one culture, and one race." For many, opening the doors feels like an existential threat rather than a policy choice. **What is "stealth immigration"?** It is the practice of bringing in foreign workers while avoiding the word "immigration." Programs like the Technical Intern Training Program, launched in 1993, and the 2018 specified-skilled-worker visa import labor without being framed as immigration policy. Public support reflects this: only 23 percent back "more immigration," but 62 percent support more "skilled foreign workers." **Why won't immigration alone fix the problem?** Because the low birth rate stems from a rigid economic structure. The shukatsu system hires graduates only once a year, in April, and those who miss it become "irregular workers"—over a third of the workforce—earning roughly half what regular employees make. Combined with a lifetime-employment culture that forces women to choose between career and family, this drives people away from forming families, a dynamic immigrants would eventually face too. **Which countries does Japan look to as warnings and as models?** Germany's acceptance of over a million refugees after 2015, with little preparation for integration, serves as Japan's cautionary tale, associated with parallel societies and political radicalization. By contrast, Singapore and Denmark are cited as models that pair strict controls with genuine integration pathways and routes to permanent residence and citizenship. **What does Japan's situation mean for the rest of the world?** As the world's third-largest economy and a key American ally, a hollowed-out Japan would send reverberations worldwide. Its trajectory previews what can happen when an advanced society becomes too inflexible to adapt, offering a closely watched test case for other nations facing falling birth rates. ## Sources - [Japan Times — Medical fees hit record high](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/09/04/japan/science-health/medical-fees-record-high/) - [Reuters — Special report: Asia population, Japan children](https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/asia-population-japan-children/) - [New America Media (archived)](https://web.archive.org/web/20070927175325/http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=f6f50bd7a1687ece711a7ef721bb6fb8) - [Indigenous Navigator — Japan report (PDF)](https://indigenousnavigator.org/files/media/document/Japan_ENG_0.pdf) - [Wikipedia — Koreans in Japan](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koreans_in_Japan) - [Japan Times — Europe's migration problem](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2023/05/04/commentary/world-commentary/europe-migration-problem/) - [Asahi Shimbun](https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15820762) - [Reuters — Japan must quadruple foreign workers by 2040](https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/japan-must-quadruple-foreign-workers-by-2040-meet-growth-target-report-2022-02-03/) - [Teachwire — The Japanese train that stops for just one high school student](https://www.teachwire.net/news/the-curious-tale-of-the-japanese-train-that-stops-for-just-one-high-school/) - [Japan Times — Foreign workers new residency system](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/07/28/japan/foreign-workers-new-residency-system/) - [ResearchGate — NEETs and freeters in Japan](https://www.researchgate.net/figure/NEETs-and-freeters-as-a-percentage-of-all-15-35-year-olds-in-employment-in-Japan-and_fig2_269280713) - [Japan Times — Fertility rate low](https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/06/04/japan/fertility-rate-low/) - [France 24 — Japan births in 2024 fell below 700,000 for first time](https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250604-japan-births-in-2024-fell-below-700-000-for-first-time) - [City of Utashinai (archived)](https://web.archive.org/web/20210115141648/http://www.city.utashinai.hokkaido.jp/hotnews/detail/00000027.html) - [Al Jazeera — Last students graduate as school closures spread in aging Japan](https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/2023/4/2/last-students-graduate-school-closures-spread-in-ageing-japan) - [Reuters — South Korea's policy push as life springs into world's lowest birthrate](https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/south-koreas-policy-push-springs-life-worlds-lowest-birthrate-rises-2025-02-26/) - [The Times — Italy shock therapy birthrate](https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/italy-shock-therapy-birthrate-latest-dk8qvwwrw) - [South China Morning Post — China's pro-birth policies not yet enough](https://www.scmp.com/economy/china-economy/article/3282963/chinas-pro-birth-policies-not-yet-enough-counter-demographic-crisis-expert-warns) - [Real Gaijin — Population of foreign residents in Japan](https://realgaijin.substack.com/p/population-of-foreign-residents-in) - [Nippon.com — Japan data](https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h02400/) - [World Bank — Population ages 0-14 (% of total)](https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.0014.TO.ZS) - [Asahi Shimbun](https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15952384) - [FRED — Working age population, Japan](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/SPPOPDPNDOLJPN) - [Xinhua](https://english.news.cn/asiapacific/20250414/062f35c875934cbeb4d1ce825dbfad51/c.html) - [Nippon.com — Japan data](https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h00795/) - [Korea Times — Foreign residents in South Korea hit all-time high](https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/society/20250303/foreign-residents-in-south-korea-hit-all-time-high-account-for-over-5-of-population) - [Sengoku Chronicles — Japan's Sakoku policy](https://sengokuchronicles.com/japans-sakoku-policy-isolation-and-cultural-preservation/) - [Unseen Japan — Japan technical trainees job change](https://unseen-japan.com/japan-technical-trainees-job-change/) - [Reuters — Japan opens door wider to foreign blue-collar workers](https://www.reuters.com/article/world/japan-opens-door-wider-to-foreign-blue-collar-workers-despite-criticism-idUSKBN1O704C/) - [Asia Pacific Foundation — Japan needs more labour immigration](https://www.asiapacific.ca/publication/japan-needs-more-labour-immigration-answer) - [Asahi Shimbun](https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14875679) <!-- youtube:Yak-pnLJpUY -->